Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Company Transfer The court granted sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transfer of undertaking, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Company Transfer
The court granted sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transfer of undertaking, property, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties from the Transferor company to the Transferee company. The Transferor company would be dissolved without winding up upon the Scheme taking effect. The court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements, including payment of stamp duty, taxes, and deposition of a sum in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator by the petitioner Companies within a specified timeframe. The petition was allowed, and the order was to be promptly issued.
Issues: 1. Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The judgment pertains to a Second motion joint petition filed by the petitioner Companies seeking sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner companies had previously filed an application seeking directions for dispensation of meetings, which was allowed by the court. Following this, the present petition was filed seeking sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement. Notices were issued to the Regional Director, Official Liquidator, and publications were made in newspapers as directed by the court. The Official Liquidator, after seeking information, submitted a report stating no complaints against the proposed Scheme and no prejudicial conduct by the Transferor company. The Regional Director also filed a report stating no objection to the proposed Scheme. Affidavits confirmed no objections received from any party interested in the Scheme. During the hearing, both the Official Liquidator and the Regional Director expressed no objection to the Scheme. Considering the approvals received and reports filed, the court granted sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement, directing compliance with statutory requirements within a specified timeline.
The court ordered the transfer of undertaking, property, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties of the Transferor company to the Transferee company as per the Scheme, without the need for further acts or deeds. Upon the Scheme coming into effect, the Transferor Company would stand dissolved without winding up. The order clarified that it did not grant exemption from payment of stamp duty, taxes, or other charges, or from compliance with any other specific requirements under the law. Additionally, the petitioner Companies agreed to deposit a sum in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator within a specified timeframe. The petition was allowed in the stated terms, and the order was directed to be issued promptly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
