<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 799 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219784</link>
    <description>The court granted sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transfer of undertaking, property, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties from the Transferor company to the Transferee company. The Transferor company would be dissolved without winding up upon the Scheme taking effect. The court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements, including payment of stamp duty, taxes, and deposition of a sum in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator by the petitioner Companies within a specified timeframe. The petition was allowed, and the order was to be promptly issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 799 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219784</link>
      <description>The court granted sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the transfer of undertaking, property, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties from the Transferor company to the Transferee company. The Transferor company would be dissolved without winding up upon the Scheme taking effect. The court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements, including payment of stamp duty, taxes, and deposition of a sum in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator by the petitioner Companies within a specified timeframe. The petition was allowed, and the order was to be promptly issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>