Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 14/2002-C.E. dated 01.03.2002 in respect of grey processed fabric when the captive consumption of cotton yarn was exempted under Notification No. 22/96-CE dated 23.07.1996.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the exemption under Notification No. 22/96-CE for captively consumed yarn and base fabric did not defeat the condition in Notification No. 14/2002-C.E. requiring payment of appropriate duty, because the duty payable read with the applicable exemption notification was nil. Reliance was placed on the Board circular clarifying that composite textile mills remained entitled to the concessional notification even where the intermediate products were exempted from duty, and the Tribunal also noted that similarly placed units had been extended the benefit. The contrary view of the Commissioner was found unsustainable.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 14/2002-C.E., and the denial of exemption was set aside.