Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether hydraulic oil and hadilin used in the factory for operating hydraulic and die-casting machines were eligible for CENVAT credit as capital goods or, in the alternative, as inputs.
Analysis: The goods were used in the factory for manufacture of the final products and were not covered by any exclusion applicable to office-premises use. Hydraulic oil was essential for the functioning of the hydraulic machine, and even a partial shortage would stop the machine. Hadilin was used as a lubricant in the die-casting machine to cool the product and ensure flow of lead, without which the machine could not produce quality goods. The goods therefore had a direct and indispensable functional role in the manufacturing machinery. The Tribunal also noted the support drawn from the Board circular and the principle that items used in or for manufacturing equipment may qualify for credit.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on the goods, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.