Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether approval granted by the Software Technology Parks of India or the Inter-Ministerial Standing Committee for an STP/EHTP unit could be treated as approval under Section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for claiming deduction on export profits.
Analysis: The statutory scheme treated deduction under Section 10B as available only to a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking approved by the Board appointed by the Central Government under Section 14 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. Approval under the STP/EHTP scheme and approval under Section 10B operated in distinct fields, and the conditions governing the two were not identical. The notifications, circulars and instructions relied upon did not show any express delegation or substitution of the Board's function under Section 10B in favour of the STPI or the Inter-Ministerial Standing Committee. In the absence of clear statutory authorization, approval given for one scheme could not be deemed to satisfy the separate approval requirement under the other scheme.
Conclusion: The assessees were not entitled to deduction under Section 10B merely on the basis of STP approval; the question was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.