Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether approval granted by the Software Technology Parks of India under the EHTP/STP scheme, without ratification by the Board of Approval, was sufficient to claim exemption under Section 10-B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the CBDT instruction impugned on that basis was invalid.
Analysis: The approval obtained by the petitioner was for setting up a 100% export-oriented unit under the EHTP scheme and was granted by STPI under delegated powers for scheme purposes. The exemption under Section 10-B depends on approval by the Board appointed by the Central Government under Section 14 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, as reflected in Explanation 2(iv) to Section 10-B. The scheme approval and the tax exemption approval operate in different fields, and the former cannot be treated as a substitute for the latter in the absence of express statutory authorization or actual delegation covering Section 10-B approvals. The impugned clarification requiring ratification by the Board of Approval was therefore consistent with the statutory framework.
Conclusion: The STPI approval by itself did not entitle the petitioner to exemption under Section 10-B, and the challenge to the CBDT instruction failed.