Tribunal overturns deduction disallowance under Income Tax Act, remands for fresh assessment

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer (AO) to examine the claim under section 10A. The AO was directed to consider the assessee's contentions afresh, following the Delhi High Court's guidance. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Alternative claim for deduction under section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Compliance with approval requirements under section 10B.
4. Invocation of section 10B(7) read with section 80IA(10) of the Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Deduction under Section 10B:
The learned Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the assessee's claim for deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the grounds that the assessee failed to provide necessary evidence that the approval granted by the Development Commissioner of the Software Technology Park of India (STPI) was ratified by the Board of Approval for the EOU scheme, which is a crucial requirement under section 10B. Additionally, the AO noted that the assessee did not furnish documentary evidence for foreign inward remittance certificates, making the claim untenable and reducing the export turnover to Rs. 4,39,59,107/-.

2. Alternative Claim for Deduction under Section 10A:
The assessee, aggrieved by the disallowance, initially challenged the denial of the benefit under section 10B but later sought an alternative plea to allow deduction under section 10A, arguing that the provisions of section 10A are parimateria with section 10B concerning undertakings registered and approved by STPI. The Tribunal considered this alternative claim in light of the Delhi High Court's decision in the case of Regency Creations Ltd, which directed the Tribunal to consider claims under section 10A when eligibility under section 10B was not met due to approval criteria.

3. Compliance with Approval Requirements under Section 10B:
The Tribunal acknowledged the Delhi High Court's ruling in Regency Creations Ltd, which held that approval from the Director of STPI needs ratification by the Board specified in Explanation 2(iv) to section 10B for it to be valid. The Tribunal noted that the assessee's case failed to meet this requirement, and thus, the grounds related to section 10B were decided against the assessee.

4. Invocation of Section 10B(7) Read with Section 80IA(10):
The AO invoked section 10B(7) read with section 80IA(10) concerning transactions with a related party, M/s Avalon Information Systems Private Limited. However, since the Tribunal decided to remand the case to the AO for consideration under section 10A, it found it unnecessary to adjudicate on the requirements of section 10B(3) and the invocation of section 10B(7) read with section 80IA.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the issue to the AO to examine the claim under section 10A, in line with the Delhi High Court's observations and decisions in similar cases. The AO was directed to consider the assessee's contentions afresh, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

Order Pronouncement:
The order was pronounced in the open court on 04/06/2021.

---