TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court allows deduction for serving tea & cool drinks to customers, partly allows staff house expenses.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Ahmedabad Manufacturing And Calico Printing Company Limited</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Ahmedabad Manufacturing And Calico Printing Company Limited - [1992] 197 ITR 538, 105 CTR 322, 70 TAXMANN 223 Issues involved:The judgment addresses two main issues: 1. Whether the sum of Rs. 40,651 incurred for serving tea and cool drinks to customers was liable to be disallowed under section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act.2. Whether the sum of Rs. 23,022 incurred as staff house expenses, including rent and water connection, was liable to be disallowed under section 37(4) of the Act.Issue 1 - Tea and Cool Drinks Expenditure:The assessee, a public limited company, incurred Rs. 40,651 on serving tea and cool drinks to customers and claimed it as business expenditure. The Income-tax Officer disallowed this under section 37(2B), but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed it as business expenditure under section 37(1). The Tribunal upheld this view, stating the expenditure was not for entertainment but for business, thus deductible under section 37(1). The court agreed, citing a previous case, and answered in favor of the assessee.Issue 2 - Staff House Expenses:The assessee spent Rs. 23,022 on a guest house for staff members. The Income-tax Officer disallowed this under section 37(4) for maintaining a guest house. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the deduction, which the Tribunal confirmed. The Revenue argued that post-1970, such expenditure was not deductible under section 37(4). The court analyzed relevant sections and found the expenditure was covered under section 30 for rent and repairs, not falling under section 37(1). Referring to a Bombay High Court case, the court held that the expenditure was allowable under sections 30 and 31, not section 37(1), thus not disallowable under section 37(4). The court allowed deduction for Rs. 19,739 but denied for the remaining Rs. 3,283 due to lack of details.In conclusion, the court answered both questions in favor of the assessee for the tea and cool drinks expenditure and partially for the staff house expenses, based on the specific provisions of the Income-tax Act.
TaxTMI 