Foundational exemption claims require a speaking order, and the matter was remanded for fresh appellate adjudication.

The ITAT, Hyderabad set aside the first appellate order and remanded the matter to the CIT(A) because the assessee's foundational exemption claims under sections 11 and 10(1) were not first decided by a reasoned speaking order. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had proceeded issue-wise on the assessment additions without properly addressing the primary exemption plea, and it followed the course adopted in the assessee's own later-year proceedings, where the exemption claims were directed to be examined afresh after proper opportunity and verification. The CIT(A) was therefore directed to reconsider the exemption claims and adjudicate the appeal afresh in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the matter required remand to the CIT(A) for a speaking order on the assessee's claim for exemption under sections 11 and 10(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The appeal arose from an order where the CIT(A) had dealt with the assessment addition-wise without first recording a reasoned finding on the assessee's primary claim for exemption under sections 11 and 10(1). The Tribunal noted that an earlier order in the assessee's own case for a later year had already dealt with the same controversy and directed that the exemption claims be examined afresh after proper opportunity and verification. In the present year, the Tribunal found it appropriate to ensure that the first appellate authority addresses the exemption issue by a speaking order and adjudicates the appeal afresh in accordance with law.

Conclusion: The matter was set aside to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration of the exemption claims and a speaking order after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the first appellate authority has not rendered a reasoned decision on the foundational exemption claim, the matter may be remanded for fresh adjudication on that issue after due opportunity.

---