Assessable value remand sustained for concrete mixer machines as motor or engine inclusion needed fresh duty redetermination.

The dispute concerned whether the assessable value of concrete mixer machines had to include the value of the motor or engine, and whether the appellate remand directing redetermination of duty liability was sustainable. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had already sent the matter back for re-examination of valuation and duty, and that the remand power under Section 35A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 had been curtailed. As the valuation issue still required fresh determination, the Tribunal sustained the remand and sent the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration of assessable value and consequential duty liability.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellate authority's remand order and the direction to redetermine duty liability on the basis of inclusion of the value of motor/engine in the assessable value of concrete mixer machines were sustainable.

Analysis: The appeal challenged the finding of clandestine removal and the consequential remand for reconsideration of valuation. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had already remanded the matter for re-examination of the assessable value and duty liability, and that the power of remand under Section 35A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 had been curtailed. Since the value issue still required redetermination, the Tribunal found it appropriate to send the matter back to the adjudicating authority in terms of the appellate direction.

Conclusion: The remand was sustained and the matter was sent back for fresh consideration of valuation and consequential duty liability.

---