Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (8) TMI 494 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee qualifies for exemption under Section 10(23FB) by meeting investment percentage requirement as per SEBI guidelines The ITAT, Pune, held that the assessee qualified for exemption under Section 10(23FB) by meeting the investment percentage requirement within the fund's ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Assessee qualifies for exemption under Section 10(23FB) by meeting investment percentage requirement as per SEBI guidelines

                              The ITAT, Pune, held that the assessee qualified for exemption under Section 10(23FB) by meeting the investment percentage requirement within the fund's life cycle as per SEBI guidelines. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to grant exemption for interest income. The court's ruling was issued on 29.06.2012.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Entitlement to exemption under Section 10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act.
                              2. Compliance with SEBI Regulations, particularly Regulation 12(d)(i) regarding investment in unlisted equity shares.
                              3. Calculation of "investible funds" as per SEBI Regulation 2(hh).
                              4. Treatment of interest income from bank deposits under Section 10(23FB).

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Entitlement to Exemption under Section 10(23FB):

                              The primary issue in the appeal was whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2004-05. The assessee, engaged in providing venture capital by investing in equity capital, claimed exemption on the net income of Rs.69,95,950/- after deducting business loss from the interest earned on bank deposits.

                              2. Compliance with SEBI Regulations:

                              The Assessing Officer (AO) denied the exemption, arguing that the assessee did not fulfill the condition under SEBI Regulation 12(d)(i), which requires at least 66.67% of the investible funds to be invested in unlisted companies. The AO found that the assessee's investment in listed securities was below the specified limit.

                              3. Calculation of "Investible Funds":

                              The ITAT had previously remitted the matter to the CIT(A) to verify the investment pattern vis-`a-vis the investible funds, defined under SEBI Regulation 2(hh) as the corpus net of expenses for administration and management. The CIT(A) was directed to compute the investible funds correctly and ascertain compliance with SEBI guidelines.

                              4. Treatment of Interest Income:

                              The CIT(A) observed that the assessee achieved the required investment percentage of 66.67% in the financial year 2005-06, within the life cycle of the Venture Capital Fund. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's position that the term "investible funds" should exclude administrative and management expenses, leading to a compliant investment percentage.

                              In the set-aside proceedings, the assessee presented a detailed chart showing the investible funds and investments made, demonstrating compliance with the stipulated percentage over the years. The CIT(A) noted that this position was accepted in the assessee's appeals for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07.

                              The CIT(A) concluded that the assessee fulfilled the conditions laid down under Regulation 12(d)(i) of the SEBI Regulations by achieving the prescribed investment percentage within the life cycle. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 10(23FB) for the interest income earned.

                              The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the AO was not justified in denying the exemption for the interest income. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the assessee's entitlement to the claimed exemption.

                              Conclusion:

                              The ITAT, Pune, concluded that the assessee met the conditions for exemption under Section 10(23FB) by achieving the required investment percentage as per SEBI guidelines within the fund's life cycle. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and the CIT(A)'s direction to grant exemption for the interest income was upheld. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 29.06.2012.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found