Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a job worker clearing goods under Notification No. 214/86 dated 25th March, 1986 could be denied Cenvat credit on inputs merely because the goods were treated as exempted at that stage.
Analysis: The entitlement to credit was examined in the light of the earlier stay order, which had already noted that the appellant stood covered by the benefit recognized in Flex Chemicals and Modi Sales. The relevant consideration was that the goods were not exempt goods in the hands of the ultimate manufacturer and were, in substance, dutiable at the intermediate stage. On that factual and legal basis, denial of Cenvat credit was not justified.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to Cenvat credit and the denial of credit was set aside.