Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on fuel used by the assessee in the manufacture of PET Chips cleared partly on job work basis and whether the disallowance was justified on the ground that the goods were ultimately used in relation to exempted clearances.
Analysis: The relevant scheme under Rule 57C and Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 restricts credit where inputs are used in exempted final products and contemplates reversal, payment, or maintenance of separate accounts for common inputs. However, the judgment treats inputs used as fuel as falling outside the restrictive operation of the common-input machinery, and notes that the assessee was manufacturing PET Chips as its own dutiable final product as well as on job work. The authorities below found that the fuel credit related to the assessee's own inputs and that the credit could not be denied merely because part of the production was on job work basis.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the fuel was admissible, and the disallowance of credit was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit on inputs used as fuel cannot be denied by mechanically applying the common-input restrictions when the statute excludes fuel from that restriction and the assessee is otherwise manufacturing dutiable final products.