Wealth-tax valuation of ceiling-law land must reflect statutory transfer restrictions, not unrestricted marketability.

Land burdened by the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 must be valued for wealth-tax by reference to the depressed value it would fetch in a hypothetical open market, because statutory transfer restrictions materially affect marketability. The expression "if sold in the open market" does not justify ignoring the real legal constraints attached to the asset. Where land is surplus or otherwise subject to ceiling-law restrictions, valuation must reflect that burden rather than assume free transferability. A valuation at unrestricted market rate was therefore treated as unsustainable on the stated facts, and the earlier acceptance of a depressed value supported that approach.

---

---

Issues: Whether land declared surplus and affected by the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 was required to be valued for wealth-tax purposes at the open market rate or by taking into account the statutory restrictions and the compensation payable under the ceiling law.

Analysis: The expression "if sold in the open market" in wealth-tax valuation provisions contemplates a hypothetical open market and not an actual sale, but the valuation must still reflect the real nature of the asset. Where transfer of land is restricted by ceiling legislation, the value ordinarily stands depressed and cannot be assessed as though the land were freely transferable. Once the statutory scheme and the factual position show that the land is surplus or otherwise burdened by the ceiling law, the impact of those restrictions must be taken into account. Applying that principle, and noting that the Revenue had already accepted the depressed valuation in earlier years, the Tribunal's approach of valuing the property at unrestricted market rate was held to be unsustainable.

Conclusion: The land had to be valued with reference to the restrictions under the ceiling law and not at unrestricted open market rate; the question was answered in the negative, against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: For wealth-tax valuation, land burdened by statutory transfer restrictions must be valued on the basis of the depressed value it would fetch in a hypothetical open market, and not as if it were freely marketable.

---