<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 533 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214965</link>
    <description>Land burdened by the Urban Land (Ceiling &amp; Regulation) Act, 1976 must be valued for wealth-tax by reference to the depressed value it would fetch in a hypothetical open market, because statutory transfer restrictions materially affect marketability. The expression &quot;if sold in the open market&quot; does not justify ignoring the real legal constraints attached to the asset. Where land is surplus or otherwise subject to ceiling-law restrictions, valuation must reflect that burden rather than assume free transferability. A valuation at unrestricted market rate was therefore treated as unsustainable on the stated facts, and the earlier acceptance of a depressed value supported that approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 533 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214965</link>
      <description>Land burdened by the Urban Land (Ceiling &amp; Regulation) Act, 1976 must be valued for wealth-tax by reference to the depressed value it would fetch in a hypothetical open market, because statutory transfer restrictions materially affect marketability. The expression &quot;if sold in the open market&quot; does not justify ignoring the real legal constraints attached to the asset. Where land is surplus or otherwise subject to ceiling-law restrictions, valuation must reflect that burden rather than assume free transferability. A valuation at unrestricted market rate was therefore treated as unsustainable on the stated facts, and the earlier acceptance of a depressed value supported that approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>