Franchise service classification for port crane operations failed prima facie, leading to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.

Permission to operate cranes inside a port did not, on the available agreements, prima facie amount to franchise service because the contracts showed only a licence to render crane-operating services on payment of licence fee and no clause granting representational rights. The Port Trust's power under Section 42 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 to render services itself or through authorised persons also supported that view. On that interim assessment, a prima facie case was made out, pre-deposit was waived, and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a demand of service tax treating the permission to operate cranes inside the port as franchise service.

Analysis: The Port Trust was empowered under Section 42 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 to render services itself or through duly authorised persons. The agreements showed that crane-operating services were permitted to be rendered by third parties on payment of licence fee, but did not disclose any clause conferring representational rights on those parties. On that basis, the arrangement did not, prima facie, appear to constitute franchise service. The contemporaneous stay order in the cited port trust matter also supported the applicant's case at the interim stage.

Conclusion: A prima facie case was found in favour of the applicant, and pre-deposit was waived with recovery stayed till disposal of the appeal.

---