Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (10) TMI 488 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Contract farming receipts from hybrid seed production are business income, not agricultural income, when cultivation and marketable processing are commercially driven. Income from a contract farming arrangement for hybrid seed production was held not to be agricultural income under the Income-tax Act because the assessee ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Contract farming receipts from hybrid seed production are business income, not agricultural income, when cultivation and marketable processing are commercially driven.

                          Income from a contract farming arrangement for hybrid seed production was held not to be agricultural income under the Income-tax Act because the assessee did not itself cultivate the land in the ordinary sense and the arrangement mainly supported its commercial seed business. The Court also held that cleaning, processing and certification of the hybrid seeds were not processes ordinarily employed by a cultivator to make produce marketable under Section 2(1A)(b)(ii), as they were business-oriented activities directed to commercial specifications. As a result, the receipts were treated as business income and the Tribunal's view treating most of them as agricultural income was set aside.




                          Issues: (i) Whether income earned under the contract farming arrangement for production and sale of hybrid seeds was agricultural income exempt under Section 10(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the cleaning, processing and certification of hybrid seeds amounted to a process ordinarily employed by a cultivator to render the produce fit to be taken to market under Section 2(1A)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Issue (i): Whether income earned under the contract farming arrangement for production and sale of hybrid seeds was agricultural income exempt under Section 10(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Analysis: Agricultural income must arise from land used for agricultural purposes and must be traceable to actual agricultural operations. The definition in Section 2(1A) requires a real nexus with cultivation on land, and agricultural activity includes basic operations on the land and subsequent operations only when they form part of one integrated agricultural process. On the facts of the agreement, the assessee did not own or cultivate the land in the ordinary sense, did not pay rent or share produce as a landlord or tenant would, and mainly supplied foundation seeds, technical supervision and purchase arrangements. The farmer carried out the cultivation, while the assessee's role was directed towards production for its trading business. Such an arrangement did not give the assessee the character of a cultivator with derivative interest in land.

                          Conclusion: The income was not agricultural income and was not exempt under Section 10(1). This issue is decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the cleaning, processing and certification of hybrid seeds amounted to a process ordinarily employed by a cultivator to render the produce fit to be taken to market under Section 2(1A)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Analysis: The process contemplated by Section 2(1A)(b)(ii) is one ordinarily employed by a cultivator or receiver of rent-in-kind to make the produce marketable, and it must be ancillary to agricultural operations. Here, the process of converting foundation seeds into certified seeds involved testing, cleaning, processing and quality certification carried out as part of the assessee's commercial seed business. The Court held that this was not merely an ordinary agricultural process by a cultivator but a business-oriented processing activity. Since the assessee's basic agricultural operations were not established and the processing was undertaken to meet commercial specifications, the resulting income could not be treated as agricultural income.

                          Conclusion: The processing and certification activity did not fall within Section 2(1A)(b)(ii). This issue is decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

                          Final Conclusion: The assessees' receipts from the hybrid seed contract farming arrangements were held to be business income, and the Tribunal's view treating 90% of the receipts as agricultural income was set aside.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Income is agricultural only when it is directly derived from actual cultivation of land and from processes ordinarily and integrally connected with agricultural operations; a contract farming arrangement that mainly facilitates commercial seed production and processing does not convert the resulting receipts into agricultural income.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found