Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court rules sale of rosewood trees as capital receipts, not agricultural income</h1> <h3>Consolidated Coffee Estates (1943) Limited Versus Commissioner Of Agricultural Income-Tax, Mysore.</h3> The court allowed the revision petitions, setting aside the Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax's order. It concluded that the proceeds from the sale ... Mysore Agricultural Income Tax Act - assessee bought several coffee estates and consolidated them - amount received from sale of timber of the shade trees is a capital receipt not liable to income-tax Issues Involved:1. Whether the proceeds of sale of rosewood trees in the hands of the assessee constitute agricultural income liable to tax under the Mysore Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957.2. Whether the said amount is a capital receipt not liable to income-tax.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Agricultural IncomeThe primary issue is whether the proceeds from the sale of rosewood trees can be classified as agricultural income under the Mysore Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957. The term 'agricultural income' is defined in section 2(1)(a) of the Act, which includes any income derived from land used for growing commercial crops and involves agricultural activities.The court noted that the assessee's land comprised both cultivated areas and jungle areas. The receipts in question were primarily derived from the sale of rosewood trees from the jungle area, which was not under cultivation during the relevant accounting years. The court emphasized that for income to be considered agricultural, the land must be used for agricultural purposes during the accounting year.The court found that the Commissioner did not address whether the land from which the rosewood was extracted was actually used for agricultural purposes in the relevant years. Consequently, the court concluded that the proceeds from the sale of rosewood trees from non-cultivated land could not be regarded as agricultural income, as the primary condition of the land being used for agricultural purposes was not satisfied.Issue 2: Capital ReceiptThe second issue was whether the proceeds from the sale of rosewood trees constituted capital receipts, which are not liable to income-tax. The court examined whether the rosewood trees were of spontaneous growth or planted by human agency. The Commissioner had placed the burden of proof on the assessee to demonstrate that the trees were of spontaneous growth.The court reviewed evidence, including affidavits from experts, which indicated that the rosewood trees were over 150 years old and not planted in regular rows, suggesting they were of spontaneous growth. The court also referenced authoritative texts, which confirmed that rosewood trees are native to India and grow naturally in the Western Ghats, including Coorg.Given this evidence, the court concluded that the rosewood trees were not planted by human agency but were of spontaneous growth. Therefore, the proceeds from their sale could not be considered agricultural income as defined under the Act.Further, the court considered whether the receipts from the sale of rosewood trees were capital in nature. It noted that shade trees in coffee plantations are essential for the protection and growth of coffee bushes and are considered part of the fixed assets of the planter. The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in State of Kerala v. Karimthruvi Tea Estate Ltd., which held that the sale proceeds of shade trees in tea estates were capital receipts.Applying this principle, the court held that the rosewood trees, maintained as shade trees, were part of the capital assets of the assessee. Therefore, the proceeds from their sale were capital receipts and not taxable as income.Conclusion:The court allowed the revision petitions, setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax. The court concluded that the proceeds from the sale of rosewood trees were not agricultural income and were capital receipts, thus not liable to income-tax. The respondent was ordered to pay the costs of the petitioner.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found