Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (4) TMI 215 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, grants indexation benefits for 50% of jewellery claimed as gifts. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal in part. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute capital ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, grants indexation benefits for 50% of jewellery claimed as gifts.

                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal in part. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute capital gains with indexation benefits for 50% of the jewellery claimed as gifts. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions related to unexplained investments, long-term capital gains, and unexplained deposits, citing evidence and legal provisions supporting the assessee's contentions.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Addition of Rs. 17,22,750/- as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Deletion of Rs. 24,20,100/- addition on account of Long Term Capital Gain.
                          3. Deletion of Rs. 26,35,000/- addition on account of unexplained deposits.
                          4. Allowing claim of indexation under Section 49 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 17,22,750/- as Unexplained Investment (Section 69):
                          The assessee argued that the gold ornaments were acquired over the last forty years through marriage and other family events. The assessee provided evidence of sale through invoices and cheques, which were doubted due to lapses on the buyer's part. Additionally, wealth tax returns for A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008-09 declared such ornaments. The ornaments were not reflected in the balance sheet as they were acquired as gifts and had no cost to the appellant. The Assessing Officer (AO) did not accept the capital gain shown on the sale of gold jewellery, treating the sale proceeds as unexplained investments. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's addition. However, the Tribunal noted the assessee's community and family background, acknowledging the tradition of receiving jewellery as gifts. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute capital gains after allowing the benefit of indexation for 50% of the jewellery claimed as gifts.

                          2. Deletion of Rs. 24,20,100/- Addition on Account of Long Term Capital Gain:
                          The AO made an addition of Rs. 24,20,100/- on account of Long Term Capital Gain, arguing that the indexation should be from the date the property was transferred to the assessee on 2.4.2007, not from 1.4.1981. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, allowing the claim of indexation from 1.4.1981. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing Section 49(1)(i) and the ITAT Special Bench decision in Dy. CIT v. Manjula J. Shah, which supports indexation from the year the previous owner first held the asset. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order, confirming the cost of acquisition and indexation from 1st April 1981.

                          3. Deletion of Rs. 26,35,000/- Addition on Account of Unexplained Deposits:
                          The AO added Rs. 26.35 lakhs, suspecting it as unexplained deposits in the assessee's bank account. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, clarifying that the amount was part of the sale consideration of a property sold for Rs. 31 lakhs. The cheque issued by LIC Housing Finance Limited was part of the sale consideration, not a loan. The Tribunal found that the sale consideration was duly accounted for as income and deposited in the bank account. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding no infirmity in the deletion of the addition.

                          4. Allowing Claim of Indexation (Section 49):
                          The AO argued that the indexation should be from the date the property was transferred to the assessee on 2.4.2007. The CIT(A) allowed indexation from 1.4.1981, considering the property was acquired by the HUF before the partition. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing Section 49(1)(i) and the ITAT Special Bench decision in Dy. CIT v. Manjula J. Shah, supporting indexation from the year the previous owner first held the asset. The Tribunal confirmed the cost of acquisition and indexation from 1st April 1981, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal in part, directing the AO to recompute capital gains with indexation benefits for 50% of the jewellery claimed as gifts.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found