Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (9) TMI 634 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Arms-length pricing uses only segment operating costs; no forex adjustment; LIBOR for foreign loan interest; s.10A and s.14A issues remitted ITAT held that arms-length pricing for international software development transactions must use only operating costs allocable to the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Arms-length pricing uses only segment operating costs; no forex adjustment; LIBOR for foreign loan interest; s.10A and s.14A issues remitted

                          ITAT held that arms-length pricing for international software development transactions must use only operating costs allocable to the associated-enterprise segment (excluding bad debts/reimbursements); no foreign-exchange adjustment was warranted as the assessee's margin fell within the ALP range. Interest on foreign-currency loans should be benchmarked to LIBOR; matter remitted to AO to verify applicable average LIBOR (partly allowed). Corporate guarantee to bank for subsidiary loans is not an international transaction, so no TP adjustment. Telecommunication and implementation expenses excluded from both export turnover and total turnover for deduction under s.10A. s.14A disallowance remitted to AO for recomputation.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Rejection of Transfer Pricing documentation and adjustment of Rs. 4,19,41,501.
                          2. Computation of correct net margin under Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM).
                          3. Application of TNMM to internal uncontrolled transactions.
                          4. Exclusion of foreign exchange fluctuation in computation of operating margin under TNMM.
                          5. Rejection of contemporaneous data and use of fresh comparable search.
                          6. Use of data for FY 2005-06 only in determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP).
                          7. Use of selective information/documents not available in public domain.
                          8. Eligibility for tax holiday benefit under section 10A.
                          9. Use of additional filters in comparative analysis.
                          10. Rejection of certain comparable companies for determination of ALP.
                          11. Selection of certain companies as comparable for determination of ALP.
                          12. Addition of reimbursements received to operating cost.
                          13. Determination of arms length interest rate for loans provided to Foursoft BV Netherlands.
                          14. Determination of ALP on corporate guarantee provided.
                          15. Discrimination in determining ALP for corporate guarantee vis-a-vis similar guarantees by other companies.
                          16. Non-adjustment of net margins for functional and risk differences.
                          17. Adjustment to transfer price limited to lower end of 5% range of ALP.
                          18. Deduction of expenses from export turnover in computation of deduction u/s. 10A.
                          19. Determination of expenditure relating to exempt income and disallowance under section 14A.
                          20. Disallowance of expenses incurred towards professional and legal fees.
                          21. Imposition of interest under section 234B.
                          22. Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c).

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Rejection of Transfer Pricing Documentation and Adjustment of Rs. 4,19,41,501:
                          The assessee argued that the Transfer Pricing (TP) documentation was maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Rules. The TPO made adjustments totaling Rs. 4,19,41,501 for software services, interest on loans, and corporate guarantees. The ITAT found that the TPO should have considered only the operating cost allocable to the AE segment and excluded bad debts and reimbursements. The ITAT directed the AO to verify the segmental financials prepared by the assessee and adopt the same for arriving at the net margin on the international transaction with AEs.

                          2. Computation of Correct Net Margin under TNMM:
                          The ITAT agreed with the assessee that the TPO should have determined the ALP considering only the operating cost allocable to the AE segment. The ITAT directed the AO to verify the segmental financials and exclude bad debts and reimbursements for computing the net margin.

                          3. Application of TNMM to Internal Uncontrolled Transactions:
                          Since the ITAT resolved the primary issues in favor of the assessee, the grounds related to the application of TNMM to internal uncontrolled transactions became redundant and were not addressed.

                          4. Exclusion of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation in Computation of Operating Margin under TNMM:
                          The ITAT held that exchange fluctuation gains arise in the normal course of business and should be considered while computing the net margin. The ITAT directed that no adjustment is required as the assessee's margin falls within the Arms Length range.

                          5. Rejection of Contemporaneous Data and Use of Fresh Comparable Search:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          6. Use of Data for FY 2005-06 Only in Determination of ALP:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          7. Use of Selective Information/Documents Not Available in Public Domain:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          8. Eligibility for Tax Holiday Benefit under Section 10A:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          9. Use of Additional Filters in Comparative Analysis:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          10. Rejection of Certain Comparable Companies for Determination of ALP:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          11. Selection of Certain Companies as Comparable for Determination of ALP:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          12. Addition of Reimbursements Received to Operating Cost:
                          The ITAT directed that reimbursements should not be included in the operating cost for the AE segment.

                          13. Determination of Arms Length Interest Rate for Loans Provided to Foursoft BV Netherlands:
                          The ITAT held that the ALP for international loans should be LIBOR-based. The ITAT directed the AO to verify the actual average LIBOR rate and adopt it if the assessee's claim of 4.42% is correct.

                          14. Determination of ALP on Corporate Guarantee Provided:
                          The ITAT held that the corporate guarantee does not fall within the definition of international transaction under TP legislation. The ITAT ruled that no TP adjustment is required for the corporate guarantee transaction.

                          15. Discrimination in Determining ALP for Corporate Guarantee vis-a-vis Similar Guarantees by Other Companies:
                          The ITAT ruled that no TP adjustment is required for the corporate guarantee transaction, making this issue redundant.

                          16. Non-Adjustment of Net Margins for Functional and Risk Differences:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          17. Adjustment to Transfer Price Limited to Lower End of 5% Range of ALP:
                          The ITAT did not address this issue separately as it became redundant due to the resolution of primary issues.

                          18. Deduction of Expenses from Export Turnover in Computation of Deduction u/s. 10A:
                          The ITAT held that telecommunication charges and implementation expenses excluded from export turnover should also be excluded from total turnover while computing the deduction under section 10A.

                          19. Determination of Expenditure Relating to Exempt Income and Disallowance under Section 14A:
                          The ITAT restored the issue to the AO to rework the disallowance on a reasonable basis in accordance with the Bombay High Court's judgment in Godrej & Boyce vs. DCIT.

                          20. Disallowance of Expenses Incurred Towards Professional and Legal Fees:
                          The assessee did not press this issue, and it was dismissed as not pressed.

                          21. Imposition of Interest under Section 234B:
                          The ITAT held that charging of interest under section 234B is mandatory and consequential to the assessed income.

                          22. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c):
                          The ITAT held that there is no provision in the Act for allowing an appeal against the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c), and the ground was rejected.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for the AO to verify certain claims and recompute the net margin and interest rates as per the ITAT's guidance. The ITAT also ruled in favor of the assessee on several key issues, including the exclusion of bad debts and reimbursements from operating costs and the non-requirement of TP adjustments for corporate guarantees.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found