TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal affirms arm's length interest rate & deletion of corporate guarantee addition</h1> <h3>The DCIT Circle-1 (1), Rajkot Versus M/s. Jyoti CNC Automation Pvt Ltd.</h3> The DCIT Circle-1 (1), Rajkot Versus M/s. Jyoti CNC Automation Pvt Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Arm's length interest rate on loans to Associated Enterprise.2. Determination of arm's length price on corporate guarantees provided by the appellant company to banks on behalf of Associated Enterprise.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Arm's Length Interest Rate on Loans to Associated Enterprise:The Assessing Officer (AO) challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to reduce the arm's length interest rate on loans given to an Associated Enterprise from 4.31% to 2.40%. The CIT(A) considered the average spread over LIBOR charged in France (163 basis points) instead of the whole European region (273 basis points). The CIT(A) also rejected the inclusion of a 100 basis point addition for foreign exchange risk, stating that exchange fluctuations are inherent in comparable transactions. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s reasoning, emphasizing that the arm's length interest rate should reflect the specific economic conditions of France rather than the broader European market. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to set the arm's length interest rate at EURO LIBOR plus a 163 basis point markup, resulting in a 5.75% rate.2. Determination of Arm's Length Price on Corporate Guarantees:The AO contested the CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,01,66,650/- related to the arm's length price of corporate guarantees provided by the appellant company to banks on behalf of its Associated Enterprise. The Tribunal referenced a coordinate bench decision in Micro Ink Ltd Vs ACIT, which held that corporate guarantees do not constitute an 'international transaction' under Section 92B of the Income Tax Act unless they have a bearing on the profits, income, losses, or assets of the enterprise. The Tribunal noted that the issuance of corporate guarantees in this case was akin to shareholder activity and did not impact the appellant company's profits, income, losses, or assets. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition made by the AO, concluding that the corporate guarantees did not warrant an arm's length price adjustment.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the AO and the cross-objection filed by the assessee, confirming the CIT(A)'s order. The Tribunal's decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the arm's length interest rate for loans to the Associated Enterprise and the nature of corporate guarantees, aligning with the principles established in prior cases and the specific economic context of the transactions.
TaxTMI 