Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 32/04-ST dated 03.12.2004 for goods transport agency service on the basis of evidence showing non-availment of Cenvat credit and non-availment of the benefit of Notification No. 12/03-ST dated 20.06.2003.
Analysis: The appellate authority had examined the material placed on record, including confirmations from the transporters regarding non-availment of Cenvat credit on inputs or capital goods and non-availment of the related benefit. On that basis, it reworked the taxable value to 25% of the gross freight and quantified the short payment separately for the relevant periods. The Tribunal found that this reflected proper application of mind and no legal infirmity was shown in the appellate order.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to any further relief, and the re-determination of service tax liability on 25% of the gross freight was upheld.