<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 729 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209682</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) granted the appellant the benefit under Notification No.32/04 ST dated 03.12.2004 after considering confirmation from transporters about non-availment of cenvat credit, leading to the calculation of liability in accordance with the notification. The Tribunal dismissed both the stay application and the appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on the evidence provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 729 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209682</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) granted the appellant the benefit under Notification No.32/04 ST dated 03.12.2004 after considering confirmation from transporters about non-availment of cenvat credit, leading to the calculation of liability in accordance with the notification. The Tribunal dismissed both the stay application and the appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on the evidence provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>