Appeal deemed timely; show-cause notice refusal overturned. Remand for fair hearing on merits.

The Tribunal found that the appeal challenging the Assistant Commissioner's refusal to issue a show-cause notice was timely and not time-barred. The appellate Commissioner's order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a decision on merits, emphasizing the importance of providing a fair hearing to the appellant.

---

---

Issues:
1. Timeliness of the appeal filed by the appellant challenging the Assistant Commissioner's refusal to issue a show-cause notice.

Analysis:
The appellant sought out-of-turn disposal of their appeal, which was related to availing Cenvat credit on certain inputs that were later reversed at the instance of the Department. The Assistant Commissioner's letter dated 17-3-2009, refusing to issue a show-cause notice, led to civil consequences for the appellant. The appellant filed an appeal with the Commissioner (Appeals) on 1-5-2009, challenging the Assistant Commissioner's view communicated in the letter. The appellate authority dismissed the appeal as time-barred, but it was argued that the appeal filed by the appellant was within the period of limitation prescribed under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, stating that the appeal was not time-barred, and set aside the appellate Commissioner's order.

The Tribunal found that the appeal filed by the appellant challenging the Assistant Commissioner's refusal to issue a show-cause notice was timely and not time-barred. As a result, the appellate Commissioner's order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a decision on merits, in accordance with the law, after giving the appellant a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a fair hearing to the appellant before making a final decision on the matter.

---