Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 220(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was chargeable for the period during which the first appellate authority had reduced the assessed demand, and whether the assessee could avoid interest for that interregnum once the assessment was later restored in appeal.
Analysis: Section 220(2) fastens interest on the amount demanded by a notice under section 156 if it is not paid within time, and the proviso reduces interest only when the amount on which tax is payable is finally reduced by an appellate or revisional order. The original demand does not disappear during the pendency of appeals; it remains in suspension and is revived when the assessment is ultimately restored. The validating legislation under section 3 of the Taxation Laws (Continuation and Validation of Recovery Proceedings) Act, 1964 supports continuation of recovery on the original demand without a fresh notice. Authorities dealing with cases where the entire demand had been paid and later refunded were distinguished, because here the assessee had not discharged the full demand raised under the assessment order.
Conclusion: Interest under section 220(2) was leviable on the unpaid tax from the original demand period, and the temporary reduction granted by the first appellate authority did not wipe out the liability for interest once the assessment was restored.