Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (11) TMI 126 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal reclassifies share sale profits as business income, upholds deletion of deemed dividend. The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, treating profits from the sale of shares as business income rather than Short Term Capital Gain (STCG). ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal reclassifies share sale profits as business income, upholds deletion of deemed dividend.

                          The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, treating profits from the sale of shares as business income rather than Short Term Capital Gain (STCG). Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e), affirming that deemed dividend can only be assessed in the hands of a shareholder of the lending company.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Treatment of profit from sale of shares as Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) vs. Business Income.
                          2. Addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Treatment of Profit from Sale of Shares as STCG vs. Business Income:

                          - Facts and Background: The assessee, a Private Limited Company engaged in dealing in shares and securities, declared a total income of Rs. 12,78,98,311/- for Assessment Year 2006-07. The assessee reported STCG of Rs. 12,70,35,823/- and adjusted it against brought forward unabsorbed depreciation and short-term capital losses, applying a tax rate of 10%. The AO noted the assessee's activities included trading, speculation, investment, and derivative market transactions, and questioned the classification of profits from these activities as STCG rather than business income.

                          - AO's Findings: The AO observed that the assessee had utilized borrowed funds for investments, engaged in frequent and substantial transactions, and maintained running ledgers with brokers and associates, indicating trading rather than investment activity. The AO concluded that the transactions were business activities disguised as investments to benefit from lower tax rates on STCG.

                          - Assessee's Argument: The assessee argued that the intention at the time of purchase was to hold shares as investments, supported by board resolutions and treatment in the books of accounts. They cited various judicial precedents and CBDT Circular No. 4/2007, which allows for dual portfolios (investment and trading).

                          - CIT(A)'s Decision: The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's claim for STCG on shares held as investments as of 31.03.2005 and on shares purchased and sold during the year, directing the AO to treat these profits as STCG subject to tax at 10%.

                          - Tribunal's Analysis: The Tribunal examined the frequency and volume of transactions, the use of borrowed funds, and the assessee's treatment of shares in the books. It concluded that the transactions exhibited characteristics of trading rather than investment. The Tribunal noted that the assessee's intention seemed to be to reduce tax liability by classifying trading profits as STCG. It emphasized that the principles of res judicata do not apply to income tax proceedings, and each assessment year must be considered independently.

                          - Conclusion: The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the AO's decision, treating the profits from the sale of shares as business income rather than STCG.

                          2. Addition of Deemed Dividend under Section 2(22)(e):

                          - Facts and Background: The AO noted that the assessee had received advances from M/s Subhkam Stocks & Shares Ltd. (SSSL), where a common shareholder held more than 20% shares in both companies. The AO added Rs. 34,08,608/- as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e).

                          - CIT(A)'s Decision: The CIT(A) deleted the addition, relying on the Special Bench decision in ACIT v. Bhaumik Colour Pvt. Ltd., which held that deemed dividend can only be assessed in the hands of a shareholder of the lending company.

                          - Tribunal's Analysis: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the assessee was not a shareholder of SSSL. It referenced the Bombay High Court's approval of the Bhaumik Colour Pvt. Ltd. decision, affirming that deemed dividend can only be assessed in the hands of the shareholder.

                          - Conclusion: The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

                          Final Outcome:
                          - The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal regarding the treatment of profits from the sale of shares as business income.
                          - The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the addition of deemed dividend, upholding the CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found