Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (8) TMI 468 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Income from sale of shares classified as 'Capital gains' by Tribunal based on investment intent. The Tribunal determined that the income from the sale of shares should be classified as 'Capital gains' rather than 'Income from business'. The Tribunal ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Income from sale of shares classified as 'Capital gains' by Tribunal based on investment intent.

                          The Tribunal determined that the income from the sale of shares should be classified as 'Capital gains' rather than 'Income from business'. The Tribunal considered factors such as the holding period, intention at the time of acquisition, and the nature of the transactions. It found that the assessee's activities were more aligned with investment purposes, leading to the decision to treat the income as 'Capital gains'. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to classify the income from the sale of shares as 'Capital gains'.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Classification of income from the sale of shares as 'Income from business' versus 'Capital gains'.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Classification of Income from Sale of Shares:
                          Background and Facts:
                          The assessee filed a return for the assessment year 2006-07, declaring long-term capital gain of Rs. 1,25,336 and short-term capital gain of Rs. 24,00,367 from the sale of shares/securities. The Assessing Officer (AO) examined the transactions and noted that the assessee had engaged in frequent and high-volume transactions through multiple brokers.

                          Assessing Officer's Findings:
                          The AO observed the following:
                          - The regularity, frequency, volume, and continuity of transactions were very high.
                          - The dominant intention behind purchasing shares was to earn profit quickly.
                          - The intention of holding shares for dividends was missing.
                          - No separate accounts were maintained to distinguish between investment and stock.
                          - The assessee was actively engaged in trading shares to make quick profits.

                          Based on these observations, the AO concluded that the transactions were conducted in an organized manner with a profit motive, thus classifying the income as 'Income from business' rather than 'Capital gains'. The AO relied on several judicial decisions to support this view.

                          Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] Findings:
                          The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the totality of facts indicated that the assessee was engaged in a systematic and organized activity of trading in shares, which constituted a business. The CIT(A) noted the frequency of transactions and the reinvestment of sale proceeds into further shares as indicative of a profit motive.

                          Assessee's Arguments:
                          The assessee argued that:
                          - Frequency, volume, and holding period do not determine the nature of the asset as stock in trade or investment.
                          - The AO should have considered section 2(14) of the Act, which treats assets held by a trader as capital assets unless held as stock in trade.
                          - The investments were made from surplus funds without borrowing, indicating an intention to invest rather than trade.
                          - The assessee was a full-time working partner in other businesses and did not have the infrastructure to carry out a share trading business.
                          - CBDT Circular No 4/2007 recognizes that shares held as investments should be taxed as capital gains.

                          Tribunal's Analysis and Decision:
                          The Tribunal noted that determining whether a transaction is an investment or an adventure in the nature of trade is a mixed question of law and fact, requiring consideration of multiple factors such as the trader's usual business, the nature and quantity of commodities traded, frequency of transactions, and the intention at the time of acquisition.

                          The Tribunal found that:
                          - The mere volume of transactions is not determinative of the nature of the transaction.
                          - The assessee had been holding shares as investments from year to year and had substantial funds.
                          - Investments were made from surplus funds, and the primary intention was to earn long-term capital gains.

                          Given these factors, the Tribunal concluded that the transactions were rightly declared by the assessee as 'Capital gains' and not 'Business income'. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s order and directed the AO to treat the income from the sale of shares as 'Capital gains'.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the income from the sale of shares was directed to be treated as 'Capital gains'.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found