Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the process of flock printing, including removal of excess flocks by an electrostatic device, amounted to manufacture with the aid of power and whether the goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 5907 in view of Chapter Note 5(c) to Chapter 59.
Analysis: The process of removing excess textile flocks was found to be an integral and necessary part of completing the product, and use of electric power for that operation brought the activity within the concept of manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. At the same time, it was noticed that the goods bore a design, and if that factual position was correct, Chapter Note 5(c) to Chapter 59 could exclude the product from Heading 5907 altogether. Since this classification point had not been examined by the lower authorities and had been raised for the first time before the Tribunal, a fresh determination was considered necessary.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration of the classification issue after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.