Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand and classification could be sustained when the adjudicating authority, in remand proceedings, travelled beyond the show cause notice and fixed a new classification under Chapter 54 without notice to the assessee.
Analysis: The matter had been remanded only to determine the correct classification under Heading 5907 after considering Chapter Note 5(c) to Chapter 59 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The adjudicating authority instead concluded that the goods were not classifiable under Chapter 5907 and, without putting the assessee on notice, shifted the classification to Chapter 54. The appellate authority also mechanically affirmed that view. Since the new basis of classification was never proposed in the show cause notice and the assessee had no opportunity to meet that case, the adjudication was held to be impermissibly beyond the scope of the notice and beyond the remand directions.
Conclusion: The classification adopted in the impugned order could not be sustained and the demand based on it was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudicating authority cannot, in remand proceedings, sustain a demand on a new classification or ground that travels beyond the show cause notice and was not put to the noticee.