Tribunal allows appeal delay condonation, stresses importance of timely filings. Remands matter for further proceedings.

The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to discrepancies in the dates mentioned by the appellant. Despite the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the delay, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to condone the delay and remand the matter back to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of condonation of delay in filing appeals, ultimately disposing of the stay application and the appeal accordingly.

---

---

Issues: Delay in filing appeal, condonation of delay

The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, involved the dismissal of an appeal by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) due to unsatisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal. The appellant had filed a stay petition against the recovery of the amount, which was allowed as the issue was related to the condonation of delay. The Tribunal decided to deal with the appeal itself, as the delay was not on merits but due to a lack of sufficient cause. In the case, the appellant had initially stated that the order in original was received on 26.11.2010, and the appeal was filed on 28.01.2011, resulting in a delay of two days. However, the Commissioner observed discrepancies in the dates mentioned by the appellant, noting figures of 2, 5, and 8 days as possible delays. The Tribunal found that even if the delay was up to five days, it could have been condoned by the Commissioner. Despite the lack of explanation on how the excise clerk forgot about the order, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to condone the delay and remand the matter back to the Commissioner to decide the appeal as filed in time. The Tribunal disposed of the stay application and the appeal in this manner, emphasizing the need for condonation of the delay in filing the appeal.

---