<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 344 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to discrepancies in the dates mentioned by the appellant. Despite the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the delay, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to condone the delay and remand the matter back to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of condonation of delay in filing appeals, ultimately disposing of the stay application and the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 344 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to discrepancies in the dates mentioned by the appellant. Despite the lack of a satisfactory explanation for the delay, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to condone the delay and remand the matter back to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of condonation of delay in filing appeals, ultimately disposing of the stay application and the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>