Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim protection was warranted against coercive recovery of service tax arrears, and whether there should be any stay on the imposition of service tax on future liability.
Outcome: Leave was granted and notice was issued on the prayer for interim relief.
Analysis: The Court permitted the petitioners to seek interim relief by individual applications and restrained coercive steps for recovery of arrears of service tax due on or before 30 September 2011. It clarified that there was no stay of the levy of service tax under section 65(105)(zzzz) read with section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994, in relation to future liability from 1 October 2011.
Outcome: Interim protection was granted only against recovery of past arrears, while the operation of the levy for future liability was left undisturbed.