<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 75 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205989</link>
    <description>Interim protection was confined to coercive recovery of service tax arrears due on or before 30 September 2011, with the Court permitting the petitioners to move individual applications for interim relief and restraining recovery steps in the meantime. No stay was granted on the levy of service tax under section 65(105)(zzzz) read with section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 for future liability from 1 October 2011, so the tax remained operative for subsequent periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 75 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205989</link>
      <description>Interim protection was confined to coercive recovery of service tax arrears due on or before 30 September 2011, with the Court permitting the petitioners to move individual applications for interim relief and restraining recovery steps in the meantime. No stay was granted on the levy of service tax under section 65(105)(zzzz) read with section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 for future liability from 1 October 2011, so the tax remained operative for subsequent periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>