Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit as capital goods was admissible on Chapter 73 items used for erecting cycle stand, store bin, raw racks, rack jali, tools break, brass bags, roof structure, gate wall and trolleys.
Analysis: The items in question were used for constructing structures such as cycle stands, racks and walls. On the settled view taken by the Larger Bench, such Chapter 73 items used for making structures do not fall within the definition of capital goods. Items used for making almirahs and racks also cannot be treated as inputs for capital goods when the resulting articles are themselves outside the definition of capital goods.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was not admissible and the denial of credit was justified.