<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 473 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205375</link>
    <description>Chapter 73 items used to erect cycle stands, racks, walls, roof structures, gates and trolleys were held not to qualify as capital goods for Cenvat credit purposes, because materials used to make structures do not fall within the definition of capital goods under the settled Larger Bench view. Items used for making almirahs and racks were also not admissible as inputs where the resulting articles themselves were outside the capital goods definition. Credit was therefore denied and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 473 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205375</link>
      <description>Chapter 73 items used to erect cycle stands, racks, walls, roof structures, gates and trolleys were held not to qualify as capital goods for Cenvat credit purposes, because materials used to make structures do not fall within the definition of capital goods under the settled Larger Bench view. Items used for making almirahs and racks were also not admissible as inputs where the resulting articles themselves were outside the capital goods definition. Credit was therefore denied and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>