Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery of the demand of service tax and penalty.
Analysis: The demand arose from denial of the benefit of Notification No. 15/2004-S.T. on the footing that the services rendered were finishing and completion services. The contracts placed on record showed that the appellant's work involved supply and use of materials in addition to service. On that basis, the appellant established a strong prima facie case that, even assuming the services fell within the excluded category, service tax could not be levied on the materials component.
Conclusion: Predeposit of the demanded tax and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.