Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 214/86-CE dated 25.03.86 was admissible in respect of unmachined castings cleared for further machining and polishing by job workers.
Analysis: The notification exempts specified goods manufactured in a factory as job work and used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. Its explanation defines job work broadly to include processing or working upon raw materials or semi-finished goods so as to complete part or whole of the process resulting in the manufacture or finishing of an article, or any operation essential for that process. On that language, the expression job work is not confined to goods newly manufactured by the job worker, but extends to incomplete goods or goods requiring finishing by the job worker.
Conclusion: The notification was held applicable to the unmachined castings, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded because the exemption was construed to cover the goods sent for job work for further finishing operations.
Ratio Decidendi: A job-work exemption covering processing or finishing of raw materials or semi-finished goods extends to unfinished goods sent for essential finishing operations by a job worker.