<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 161 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203946</link>
    <description>Notification No. 214/86-CE was construed to apply to unmachined castings sent to job workers for further machining and polishing. The explanation to the notification defines job work broadly as processing or working upon raw materials or semi-finished goods to complete part or whole of the manufacturing or finishing process, including any operation essential to that process. On that reading, job work is not confined to goods newly manufactured by the job worker but extends to unfinished goods requiring essential finishing operations. The exemption was therefore held applicable and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 161 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203946</link>
      <description>Notification No. 214/86-CE was construed to apply to unmachined castings sent to job workers for further machining and polishing. The explanation to the notification defines job work broadly as processing or working upon raw materials or semi-finished goods to complete part or whole of the manufacturing or finishing process, including any operation essential to that process. On that reading, job work is not confined to goods newly manufactured by the job worker but extends to unfinished goods requiring essential finishing operations. The exemption was therefore held applicable and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>