Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment was barred by limitation because the draft order under section 144B was not actually forwarded to the assessee within the prescribed period, and whether a mere direction in the file to forward the draft order could amount to forwarding for the purpose of section 153, Explanation 1(iv).
Analysis: The assessment scheme required completion within the limitation period, subject to exclusion of the period commencing from the date on which the Income-tax Officer forwards the draft order under section 144B. The statutory scheme distinguished between making a draft order and forwarding it to the assessee. The decisive act was actual despatch or transmission of the draft order, because forwarding means putting the order into the course of transmission. A mere internal direction to the office to send the draft order did not satisfy the requirement. Since the record showed that actual forwarding took place only on 8 April 1982, after the limitation period had expired, the assessment could not be saved by the earlier noting dated 16 March 1982.
Conclusion: The assessment was barred by limitation and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of section 153, Explanation 1(iv), forwarding of a draft assessment order under section 144B requires actual despatch or transmission to the assessee within the prescribed time, and a mere direction to forward is not enough.