Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed transfer of an industrial undertaking as a going concern, comprising land, buildings, plant, machinery, stock, liabilities and employee-related obligations, fell within Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the appropriate authority was bound to issue a no objection certificate when it declined to exercise pre-emptive purchase.
Analysis: The definition of immovable property in section 269UA(d) was read broadly to cover not only land and building but also the rights and incidents attached to such transfer. A composite transfer of an undertaking could not be excluded merely because it included assets, liabilities and workmen-related obligations. The prescribed statement under section 269UC did not require a separate itemwise break-up where the transfer was of an integrated and indivisible nature. Once the authority did not exercise the right of purchase within the statutory time, it had only two lawful courses: either to recommend purchase under section 269UD or to indicate no objection so that registration could proceed under section 269UL. Keeping the matter in a legal limbo was not permissible.
Conclusion: The proposed transaction was within Chapter XX-C, the authority had failed to exercise its jurisdiction lawfully, and the petitioner was entitled to a no objection certificate under section 269UL(3).
Ratio Decidendi: A composite transfer of an industrial undertaking can fall within Chapter XX-C if immovable property as broadly defined is being transferred, and where the appropriate authority does not order pre-emptive purchase within time, it must issue a no objection certificate and cannot leave the transaction unresolved.