Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appellate Tribunal Upholds Service Tax on Security Services, Deems Second Notice Time-Barred</h1> <h3>YADAV SECURITY & CRIME INVESTIGATION Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., AHMEDABAD-I</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad confirmed service tax against the appellant for providing security services. The second notice was deemed ... Extended period of limitation - all the facts were within the knowledge of the Revenue, inasmuch as they had issued the first show cause notice on 19-10-04. As such, second show cause notice is barred by limitation. - stay granted. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad confirmed service tax of Rs. 14,91,466 against the appellant for providing security service from April 2001 to September 2005. The second show cause notice issued was deemed barred by limitation as all facts were known to the Revenue at the time of issuing the first notice. The appellant's contention on limitation was upheld, and the condition of pre-deposit of the balance tax and penalty was dispensed with. Stay petition was disposed of accordingly.