Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether spent sulphuric acid is an excisable commodity classifiable under Heading 28.07 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether handling charges are includible in its assessable value.
Analysis: The issue had already been settled by the Supreme Court, which had endorsed the Larger Bench view that spent sulphuric acid is an excisable commodity. Following that settled position, the product was treated as excisable for valuation purposes, and the charges incurred in handling were required to form part of the assessable value.
Conclusion: The product was held to be excisable and handling charges were held includible in its assessable value, in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Once a product is held to be an excisable commodity, expenses integral to its handling form part of its assessable value.