<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 150 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202820</link>
    <description>Spent sulphuric acid is treated as an excisable commodity under Heading 28.07 of the Central Excise Tariff, following the Supreme Court&#039;s approval of the Larger Bench view. On that settled position, the product is to be valued as an excisable good, and handling charges are includible in the assessable value because expenses integral to handling form part of valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 150 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202820</link>
      <description>Spent sulphuric acid is treated as an excisable commodity under Heading 28.07 of the Central Excise Tariff, following the Supreme Court&#039;s approval of the Larger Bench view. On that settled position, the product is to be valued as an excisable good, and handling charges are includible in the assessable value because expenses integral to handling form part of valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>