Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for valuation of captively consumed lead and zinc concentrate, the assessable value was required to be enhanced by adding notional profit based on the overall corporate profit or projected profit, and whether the valuation had to be determined by taking only the profit relatable to the relevant product division.
Analysis: The dispute turned on application of the cost of production method for captively consumed goods. The record showed that the department had sought to rely on the assessee's overall balance-sheet profit, while the valuation in question had to reflect the profit element relatable to the relevant goods and not to the profits of other products or divisions. The earlier Tribunal decision relied upon had already accepted that, where a multi-product assessee clears goods for captive consumption, the profit element must be linked to the product or division concerned and the inclusion of an unrelated overall profit figure is not justified. On the facts, the assessee's accounts also showed losses for the relevant year, and the attempted addition of a uniform notional profit was not supported.
Conclusion: The addition of notional profit on the basis of overall corporate profit was not warranted, and the valuation made by the lower authorities was sustained in favour of the assessee.