Pre-deposit waiver turned on prima facie export obligation compliance and reasonable explanation for missing proof.

Pre-deposit for entertaining an appeal under the Foreign Trade (Regulation and Development) Act, 1992 was found unjustified where the record showed prima facie compliance with the export obligation under the advance licence and a plausible explanation for delay in producing the original DEEC book. The appellate authority should have exercised its discretion to waive deposit because the materials indicated that no customs duty was likely leviable absent breach of the export obligation. The interim deposit condition was therefore set aside, full waiver was granted, and the statutory appeal was to be heard on merits without monetary deposit.

---

---

Issues: Whether the condition of pre-deposit imposed for entertaining the appeal under the Foreign Trade (Regulation and Development) Act, 1992 was liable to be waived in view of the petitioner's claim of compliance with the export obligation.

Analysis: The petitioner had produced material to show that the export obligation under the advance licence had been fulfilled within the extended period and that the difficulty in producing the original DEEC book was attributable to delay in endorsement by the customs authorities. The appellate authority had nonetheless insisted on a partial pre-deposit. The Court held that, on the facts placed before it, the authority ought to have exercised its discretion to grant waiver, as the explanation and supporting documents showed a prima facie case that no customs duty was leviable for want of breach of export obligation. In these circumstances, insisting on pre-deposit was found to be unjustified.

Conclusion: The condition of pre-deposit was waived in full and the appeal was directed to be heard and disposed of on merits.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded by setting aside the interim pre-deposit condition and securing consideration of the statutory appeal without monetary deposit.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the materials placed before the appellate authority disclose prima facie compliance with the export obligation and a plausible explanation for non-production of proof, the discretion to waive pre-deposit must be exercised in a fair and reasonable manner rather than by mechanically insisting on deposit.

---