Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to carry forward and set off the business losses of the earlier assessment year against the profits of the subsequent year when the return for the loss year had been filed within the time extended by the Board but the Assessing Officer had not determined the losses.
Analysis: The return for the loss year was filed within the period extended by the Board, satisfying the requirement of Section 139(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The only impediment was that the Assessing Officer had not yet quantified or determined the losses. The absence of such determination did not justify denial of the benefit claimed, and the Tribunal was justified in remanding the matter for fresh decision.
Conclusion: The assessee's claim could not be rejected on the ground that the losses had not been determined by the Assessing Officer, and the departmental appeal failed.