<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 70 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201517</link>
    <description>A return for the loss year filed within the Board-extended time satisfied the requirement of Section 139(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for carrying forward business losses. The mere fact that the Assessing Officer had not yet quantified or determined the losses did not justify denial of the set-off claim against subsequent-year profits. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s remand for fresh decision was treated as justified, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 70 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201517</link>
      <description>A return for the loss year filed within the Board-extended time satisfied the requirement of Section 139(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for carrying forward business losses. The mere fact that the Assessing Officer had not yet quantified or determined the losses did not justify denial of the set-off claim against subsequent-year profits. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s remand for fresh decision was treated as justified, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>