1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellants awarded compensation as Supreme Court upholds arbitrator's decision</h1> The Supreme Court ruled that the appellants could not forfeit the full security deposit due to a breach of contract that did not result in any loss to ... - The Supreme Court held that the appellants were not entitled to forfeit the entire security deposit of Rs. 18,332 as the breach of contract caused no loss to them. The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the arbitrator's decision awarding reasonable compensation of Rs. 7,332 to the appellants. The decision was based on the precedent set in Maula Bux v. Union of India.