Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order rejecting the tenant's application under Section 6 of the West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1950 was a decree appealable under the Code of Civil Procedure and, therefore, whether the revision was maintainable.
Analysis: The relevant enactment conferred no special right of appeal, so appealability had to be tested under the general law of civil procedure. The Court applied the settled principle that an appeal lies only where authorised by statute, but also recognised that when a civil court determines a legal right in ordinary jurisdiction, the resulting adjudication may be appealable if it answers the statutory definition of a decree. On the authority relied upon, rejection of an application to rescind or vary a decree can, in appropriate circumstances, be a formal expression of an adjudication conclusively determining a matter in controversy and thus amount to a decree. The impugned order satisfied that description and did not fall within Section 104 or Order 43, Rule 1.
Conclusion: The order was held to be a decree and appealable; consequently, the revision was not maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a civil court's order on an application to rescind, vary, amend, or modify an existing decree conclusively determines the parties' rights and constitutes a formal expression of adjudication, it is a decree and not a revisable non-appealable order.