Writ interference in payment of wages proceedings is premature at the notice stage where statutory hearing remains available.

A writ challenge to Labour Court proceedings under the Payment of Wages Act was considered premature where the matter was only at the stage of admission notice under Section 15(2). The grievance regarding alleged unlawful deduction or delayed payment could still be raised before the competent authority at final adjudication under Section 15(3). A notice in Form E under the Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 was treated as the prescribed statutory format and, by itself, did not indicate haste or denial of hearing. In these circumstances, writ interference was not warranted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the Labour Court's admission of an application under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and issuance of notice in Form E was maintainable at the threshold.

Analysis: The application before the Labour Court had only reached the stage of admission notice under Section 15(2) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936. The Court held that the petitioner's grievance, including the distinction between alleged unlawful deduction and delayed payment, could be raised before the competent authority at the stage of final adjudication under Section 15(3). It further held that the notice issued in Form E under the Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 was in the prescribed statutory format and did not by itself show haste or denial of hearing. In such circumstances, interference in writ jurisdiction was unwarranted.

Conclusion: The writ petition was premature and no interference with the proceeding pending before the Labour Court was called for.

---